Skip to content

Flow

A Critical Forum on Media and Culture

Flow logo (gif)

A Critical Forum on Media and Culture

  • Home
  • ABOUT FLOW
  • CONTRIBUTE
    • HOW TO CONTRIBUTE
    • CURRENT CALLS
  • CREDITS
    • AUTHORS
    • EDITORIAL TEAM
    • TECHNICAL CREDITS
    • FORMER EDITORS
  • OVER*FLOW

Category: 2.02

This Week on Flow (April 15, 2005)

April 15, 2005 Allison Perlman / University of California - Irvine Leave a comment

by: Allison Perlman / FLOW Staff
Welcome to Flow

Read more

The Copyright Creative Stranglehold

April 15, 2005 Patricia Aufderheide / American University 11 comments

by: Patricia Aufderheide / American University
A discussion of the negative effects of copyright law on documentary production.

Read more

Pass the Remote: Adult Swim

April 15, 2005 Shana Heinricy, Matthew Thomas Payne, Angela McManaman 22 comments

by: Shana Heinricy, Matt Payne, and Angela McManaman
Who is the “we” in those ubiquitous [Adult Swim] promos?

Read more

Disappointment and Disgust, or Teaching?

April 15, 2005 John Hartley / Queensland University of Technology, Australia 8 comments

by: John Hartley / Queensland University of Technology
Is ‘disappointment’ and ‘the teaching of disgust’ the ‘core of our discipline’? Or might teaching better be accomplished by inspiring positive civic action. Either way, doesn’t reality TV do it better than we do?

Read more

Inside the Beeb

April 15, 2005 Jim McGuigan / Loughborough University, UK 3 comments

by: Jim McGuigan / Loughborough University, UK
How can a public network like the BBC survive in the age of privatization?

Read more

Flotsam

April 15, 2005 Christopher Anderson / Indiana University 2 comments

by: Christopher Anderson / Indiana University
How does our understanding of television change when we replace the idea of “flow” with “flotsam”?

Read more

Copps’s Hypothesis: Indecency and Media Ownership

April 15, 2005 Frederick Wasser / Brooklyn College 9 comments

by: Frederick Wasser / Brooklyn College
Wasser considers a hypothesis of FCC commissioner Michael Copps: is there a relationship between media deregulation and vulgar programming?

Read more

Symbolic Inversion: Git-R-Done!

April 15, 2005 Brian L. Ott / Colorado State University 17 comments

by: Brian L. Ott / Colorado State University
What is appealing about Jeff Foxworthy?

Read more

Meaningful Mysteries – Psychoanalytic Pleasures in Today’s TV

April 15, 2005 Sharon Ross / Columbia College Chicago 11 comments

by: Sharon Ross / Columbia College Chicago
A consideration of the pleasure of unraveling contemporary television’s “meaningful mysteries.”

Read more

Notes from the Blogosphere

April 15, 2005 Rachel Weiss 12 comments

by: Rachel Weiss
Blogs are the new reality television.

Read more
Flow is a critical forum on media and culture published by the Department of Radio-Television-Film at the University of Texas at Austin. Flow’s mission is to provide a space where scholars and the public can discuss media histories, media studies, and the changing landscape of contemporary media.

Search Flow:

Archives

Over*Flow: Responses to Breaking TV & Media News

image description
Over*Flow: “Effort is Overrated: The Dissonance of AI Integrations with the 2024 Olympics”
Kathryn Hartzell / University of Texas at Austin

Martha Stewart holding a credit card
Over*Flow: “Martha Stewart’s Star Persona and the 21st-Century Influencer”
Emma Ginsberg / Georgetown University

@FlowTV Conversations…

FLOW Follow

A critical forum on media and culture brought to you by the graduate students of @UTRTF.

FlowTV
flowtv FLOW @flowtv ·
1 May

In "Welcome to Wrexham and Representations of Management in Football (Soccer) as a Product of the “Media Sports Cultural Complex”" Andrew Stubbs-Lacy explores representation & construction of management in football with a focus on Welcome to Wrexham. Read: http://tinyurl.com/4z7wkuk8

Reply on Twitter 1917940648881049849 Retweet on Twitter 1917940648881049849 Like on Twitter 1917940648881049849 Twitter 1917940648881049849
flowtv FLOW @flowtv ·
30 Apr

Dr. Roderik Smits explores various factors affecting what constitutes “fair pay” in the film and television industries. Read it here: http://tinyurl.com/mrn5wv9v

Reply on Twitter 1917668522072613233 Retweet on Twitter 1917668522072613233 1 Like on Twitter 1917668522072613233 1 Twitter 1917668522072613233
flowtv FLOW @flowtv ·
29 Apr

Gerald Sim critiques Big Tech’s lobbying strategies against antitrust legislation, arguing that companies use technoliberal narratives, racialized imagery & nationalist rhetoric, such as the “China Argument,” to manipulate public opinion and more. http://tinyurl.com/ycka7652

Reply on Twitter 1917344662869704942 Retweet on Twitter 1917344662869704942 Like on Twitter 1917344662869704942 Twitter 1917344662869704942
flowtv FLOW @flowtv ·
28 Apr

.@mediated1 argues that advertising’s integration of AI media technologies is not driven by natural market tendencies but from systemic commodification & political-economic forces, analyzed through the Political Economy of Media & Communications framework. http://tinyurl.com/3yajfcmb

Reply on Twitter 1916934690428113010 Retweet on Twitter 1916934690428113010 Like on Twitter 1916934690428113010 Twitter 1916934690428113010
Load More

Popular Posts

  • Pass the Remote: Online News

    June 10, 2005 179 comments
  • Why Do I Love Television So Very Much?

    March 9, 2007 95 comments
  • Watching Everybody Hates Chris in Brazil
    Reighan Gillam / University of Michigan
    March 5, 2013 91 comments
  • Awkward Conversations About Uncomfortable Laughter

    November 4, 2005 67 comments
  • Why Don’t I Like Breaking Bad?
    Kate Warner / University of Queensland
    February 11, 2014 60 comments

Tags

Advertising American Politics Branding Comedy Commercial Interests Communication Technology COVID-19 Criticism Family Fandom Femininity Feminism Gender Global Media Global Politics Industry Media Influence Music Netflix New Media News Over*Flow Pedagogy Pop Culture Public Media Race/Ethnicity Radio Reality TV Representation social media Sports Media streaming Technology Television Viewing Volume 23 Volume 24 Volume 25 volume 26 Volume 27 Volume 28 Volume 29 Volume 30 Volume 31 Youth Culture