Skip to content

Flow

A Critical Forum on Media and Culture

A Critical Forum on Media and Culture

  • Home
  • ABOUT FLOW
  • CONTRIBUTE
    • How to Contribute
    • CURRENT CALLS
  • CREDITS
    • AUTHORS
    • EDITORIAL TEAM
    • TECHNICAL CREDITS
    • FORMER EDITORS
  • OVER*FLOW

Category: 2.07

This Issue on Flow (24 June 2005)

June 24, 2005 Elliot Panek / Emerson College Leave a comment

by: Elliot Panek / FLOW Staff
Welcome to Issue 7.

Read more

Discovering the Art of Television’s Endings

June 24, 2005 Jane Feuer / University of Pittsburgh 9 comments

by: Jane Feuer / University of Pittsburgh
A consideration of the aesthetics of the television season finale.

Read more

Flowers Powers: Mars or Venus?

June 24, 2005 John Hartley / Queensland University of Technology, Australia 6 comments

by: John Hartley/ Queensland University of Technology
Is media studies in need of planetary realignment? Or, how learning to appreciate Benny Hill might solve the Fiske/McChesney divide.

Read more

TV Down Under

June 24, 2005 Jim McGuigan / Loughborough University, UK 2 comments

by: Jim McGuigan / Loughborough University, UK
Is Austrialian television closer to American or British TV?

Read more

Some Good News about the News: 5 Reasons Why ‘Fake’ News is Better than Fox ‘News’

June 24, 2005 Brian L. Ott / Colorado State University 10 comments

by: Brian Ott / Colorado State University
There is no more destructive, deleterious, and dangerous institution in society today than the mainstream news media.

Read more

What Do We Want from TV Studies?

June 24, 2005 Sharon Ross / Columbia College Chicago 2 comments

by: Sharon Ross / Columbia College Chicago
On a practical level, how do we as scholars, teachers, and activists manage to address the many facets of TV today? What do we want from TV Studies?

Read more

If We Are So Smart….

June 24, 2005 Frederick Wasser / Brooklyn College One comment

by: Frederick Wasser / Brooklyn College
How can media studies address television’s impact on contemporary politics? A further consideration of the political economy/cultural studies debate.

Read more
Flow is a critical forum on media and culture published by the Department of Radio-Television-Film at the University of Texas at Austin. Flow’s mission is to provide a space where scholars and the public can discuss media histories, media studies, and the changing landscape of contemporary media.

Search Flow:

Archives

Over*Flow: Responses to Breaking TV & Media News

Over*Flow: “It’s Not Steroids, It’s Testosterone!”: Deconstructing Gender and Sex in Bros (2022)
Lauren Herold / Kenyon College and Nicole Erin Morse / Florida Atlantic University

"Blonde is a Kind of Person": A Cultural History of the Dumb Blonde
Kelly Coyne / Northwestern University

@FlowTV Conversations…

FLOW Follow

A critical forum on media and culture brought to you by the graduate students of @UTRTF.

FlowTV
Retweet on Twitter FLOW Retweeted
flowtv FLOW @flowtv ·
21 Nov

@rahul_mukh explores the infrastructures and services underpinning the shift to mobile streaming in India. Discover more here: https://www.flowjournal.org/2023/11/streaming-indias-neomobile-audiences/

Reply on Twitter 1727001424955944979 Retweet on Twitter 1727001424955944979 4 Like on Twitter 1727001424955944979 5 Twitter 1727001424955944979
flowtv FLOW @flowtv ·
25 Nov

In the final column of Flow 30.2, Lauren Steimer discusses the unacknowledged dangers of on-set stunt work. Read more here: https://www.flowjournal.org/2023/11/accident-the-true-dangers-of-stunt-work/

Reply on Twitter 1728450975763939368 Retweet on Twitter 1728450975763939368 2 Like on Twitter 1728450975763939368 1 Twitter 1728450975763939368
flowtv FLOW @flowtv ·
24 Nov

Maggie Rossman's look at audience reception of the film Barbie demonstrates that even simplistic feminist discourse can lead to complicated affective responses. Read the article here: https://www.flowjournal.org/2023/11/becoming-the-barbie-spectator/

Reply on Twitter 1728093620656627793 Retweet on Twitter 1728093620656627793 10 Like on Twitter 1728093620656627793 24 Twitter 1728093620656627793
flowtv FLOW @flowtv ·
23 Nov

This year (and all years), Flow is thankful for the hard work of our columnists, who share their exciting scholarship with us, and our @UTRTF grad student volunteers, without whom our issues would never be published. Thanks to all who support Flow! Read the latest issue here:

FLOW @FlowTV

This issue has everything — OTT infrastructure, sports management, stunt labor, speculative design, and Barbie! Check out the fantastic articles by @Courtney_BD, @rahul_mukh, Branden Buehler, Brianna Dym, Margaret Rossman, and Lauren Steimer here: http://flowjournal.org

Reply on Twitter 1727748849270182069 Retweet on Twitter 1727748849270182069 1 Like on Twitter 1727748849270182069 6 Twitter 1727748849270182069
Load More

Popular Posts

  • Pass the Remote: Online News

    June 10, 2005 188 comments
  • Legal Fictions

    June 10, 2005 120 comments
  • Why Do I Love Television So Very Much?

    March 9, 2007 100 comments
  • Watching Everybody Hates Chris in Brazil
    Reighan Gillam / University of Michigan
    March 5, 2013 93 comments
  • La telenovela mexicana en el ciberespacio

    April 20, 2007 72 comments

Tags

Advertising American Politics Branding Comedy Commercial Interests Communication Technology COVID-19 Criticism Family Fandom Femininity Feminism Gender Globalization Global Media Global Politics Industry Media Influence Music Netflix New Media News Over*Flow Pedagogy Pop Culture Public Media Race/Ethnicity Radio Reality TV Representation social media streaming Technology Television UK Viewing Volume 23 Volume 24 Volume 25 volume 26 Volume 27 Volume 28 Volume 29 Whiteness Youth Culture