Laura Petrie and Performance as Wifely Duty
Annie Berke / Hollins University


We might as well start where so many episodes of The Dick Van Dyke Show (CBS, 1961-1966) do: with our goofy hero, Rob Petrie (Van Dyke), tripping over the ottoman in his living room. In this incarnation of the show’s opening credits, the supporting cast—wife Laura and son Richie (played by Mary Tyler Moore and Larry Mathews) and co-workers Buddy and Sally (Morey Amsterdam and Rose Marie)—rushes to help a laughing Rob to his feet. This sequence encapsulates the premise of the show, namely the intertwining of work and home for a television writer not unlike the show’s creator, Carl Reiner. As David Marc notes in his book Comic Visions, the divide between home and work in The Dick Van Dyke Show is negotiable, not unlike its sitcom precursor, I Love Lucy (CBS, 1951-1957), in which Ricky might break into song in their New York apartment or where Lucy reveals her pregnancy during a show at the Tropicana. [1]


A tidy domestic space littered with prat-falls.

Still, we spend more time at Rob’s place of work than at Ricky’s, where the Rob-Buddy-Sally bond establishes the “alternative” or “workplace” family sitcom further developed in later sitcoms including The Mary Tyler Moore Show (CBS, 1970-1977), Cheers (NBC, 1982-1993), even The Office (NBC, 2005-2013) or 30 Rock (NBC, 2006-2013). But unlike many of these other shows and the workspaces they present, the Alan Brady writers’ room of Dick Van Dyke looks like a cozy upper-middle class home, with non-descript wall art, a communal coat hanger, and, in place of a round table, a coffee table around which Rob, Sally, and Buddy exchange zingers and unsolicited advice. While there is a typewriter, and Sally does use it, her desk is tucked away stage right, and the typewriter’s unprivileged place on a solo desk does not lend itself to collaborative work – unless we count performing for one another and for the viewers at home as labor.


Writers Rob, Sally, and Buddy in their office/abode.

Rob connects the Petrie writers’ room and the Petrie home, and his primacy as a silly patriarch in both “homes” is never in doubt, but this essay is not about Rob, or, at least, not entirely. Instead, let us turn our attention to Laura, the queen of her Westchester castle and a character whose own transgressions of the work/home divide create comedy and conflict, establishing her as a sneakily subversive hybrid of the housewife and the performer, and troubling the distinction between those two roles.


For the Petries, the domestic space can easily change into a rehearsal or a performance space.

Carl Reiner recently said of Moore: “She was grace personified. She could never take a wrong step…. The fact that she started out as a dancer was indicative of everything she did after that. Her grace was unmistakable. I saw it the first time she walked into my office.” [2] That Moore’s character, Laura, is a retired dancer factors into a series of storylines, including Season 1’s “To Tell Or Not To Tell.” In this episode, the Petries host a party at which, after comedy performances from Buddy, Sally, and Rob, the crowd clamors for Laura to dance. At first, she pretends to demur, saying “oh no…,” but before the people around her can respond, strikes a pose and launches into a boldly mod and seemingly improvised routine: apparently, Laura is no shrinking violet. She proceeds to fill in for a missing dancer at The Alan Brady Show, throwing her household into comparative—read: sitcom—chaos. Rob worries that, now that his wife has returned to her old stomping grounds (so to speak), she won’t want to return to being a wife and mother. The television gods swoop in and nullify this potential problem: while Laura is invited to stay on the show permanently, she is flattered but disinterested in returning to the stage full-time. Thus, the show has its cake and eats it too. Laura could be a dancer, but doesn’t want to, while the begrudgingly egalitarian Rob is rewarded with a contented stay-at-home wife. The Season 3 episode “My Part-Time Wife” has a similar plot, in which Laura serves as a typist in Rob’s writers’ room. Rob, threatened by her talents and seeming ability to balance her home and work responsibilities, is shocked to discover by episode’s end that Laura is exhausted and eager to return to the role of happy homemaker.

What do these plots reveal beside Laura’s competence in all things? The situation comedy is, in many ways, a conservative genre, and Laura’s return to the home is partially mitigated by the fact that it is always presented as her choice and that she understands her work in the home as a difficult and legitimate form of labor. Such plotlines as I have described above position the figure of Laura Petrie as an inverse of Friedan’s “feminine mystique”: rather than struggling with unarticulated disappointment, however, Laura speaks frequently and articulately on these issues without wanting any change in her situation. While we are not yet in “working woman” or Mary Richards territory, this public reckoning with the housewife’s dilemma is a decisive move in that direction.

But that’s not all. To return to the start of this essay, the fuzzy boundaries between home and work not only converts the writers’ room into a familial zone but also makes the home legible as a stage or performance space. Rob and Laura are not just husband and wife but scene partners to boot, finding romantic and creative fulfillment in one another and how they play together and off one another. In the Season 1 episode “Oh How We Met on the Night That We Danced,” we learn that Rob and Laura met while he was a Sergeant in the Army and she danced in the USO. It is love at first sight for Rob, aversion for Laura, so he bribes her dance partner to let him dance with her on-stage. The two perform a romantic duet, the humor stemming as much from Laura’s barely concealed snarl as from Rob’s gangly soft-shoe. Their anti-chemistry chemistry signals Rob and Laura’s compatibility: after all, they somehow know how to sing and dance together, in spite of her initial hostility and their never having rehearsed together. While Rob does step on her foot and break her toe at the end of the dance, this conclusion only serves as the (off-screen) pretext for him to show his caring nature and win her heart. Laura’s injury proves less important than our witnessing their meet-ness as a duo, their marital bliss signaled and performed through a musical number.


For the Petries, the domestic space can easily change into a rehearsal or a performance space.

Another example of the marriage-as-duet motif comes through in the Season 2 episode, “The Two Faces of Rob,” in which Rob, in researching the plausibility of a sketch for the show, disguises his voice on the phone with Laura to see if she recognizes him. A flirtatious energy passes between the two, leaving Rob worried and jealous of his own alter ego. The same Laura from “To Tell Or Not To Tell”—an unabashed and joyous performer—comes out to play in this episode, purring, cooing, and leaning into the archetype of the restless suburban wife. Could Laura have been duped by Rob’s charade and, in fact, be on the prowl for an extramarital affair?

No, of course not. Yet, again, we see how Laura the housewife incorporates performance and whimsy into her daily life, this example being fairly innocent foreplay; as Robert David Sullivan writes for The A.V. Club, this interaction “implie[s] that Laura likes a little role-playing to spice up the Petries’ sex life.” [3] Stephen Bowie of Vulture points out the episode’s “big” reveal: Laura gets off the phone after a seductive conversation with the fairly forward “Dr. Bonnelli” and turns to visiting neighbor Millie. “Who was that?” Millie asks. “Rob,” Laura chirps, returning to the Girl-Next-Door we never really feared she wasn’t… did we? “It is one of Moore’s most delicious line readings,” Bowie justly declares. The episode ends with her accidentally propositioning a real wrong number, believing it to once again be Rob. When Laura discovers her mistake, she is suitably mortified, while Rob is amused and attracted, the scene ending on a long and suggestive smooch. Laura may not perform for pay anymore, but what her character and storylines reveal is the home as a site of play, fun, and style, and who better than Mary Tyler Moore to teach this lesson?


Laura is unafraid of a little make-believe between spouses.

Image Credits
1. Vulture
2. The Franklin Chronicles
4. ShareTV
5. Blogspot

Please feel free to comment.

  1. David Marc, Comic Visions: Television Comedy and American Culture, 2nd ed. (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers, 1997). []
  2. Cynthia Littleton, “Carl Reiner Remembers Mary Tyler Moore: ‘She Was Grace Personified,’” Variety 25 January 2017 . []
  3. Robert David Sullivan, “Examining The Dick Van Dyke Show’s comedy in just 10 episodes,” A.V. Club 12 September 2012 . []


  • I think it’s interesting how these storylines of Laura Petrie in the episodes that you mention, one second push the boundaries of the American Housewife (letting Laura be a dancer on the show), giving me hope that this character will be free to pursue her interests, and then they close that door at the end of the episode, when Rob is relieved that Laura doesn’t continue with these modern ways.
    Wonderful article, thank you!

  • That episode “Oh how we danced on the night that we met” hit me VERY close to home. But didn’t end the same way. On the show, Rob ultimately wins Laura over by visiting her in the hospital after accidentally breaking her toes following their dance to the “You Wonderful You” number. He presents her with flowers, candy, and “dozens of cookbooks.” It took her “about three weeks to realize what a wonderful person” Rob was. I tried something similarly benevolent with a girl with whom I was friendly…hoping she would realize that I, likewise, was more than just a nice guy. Then she dropped a Marciano-like bomb on me: she had a boyfriend (don’t they ALL?!) I felt like an absolute fool…trying to win over someone who was already taken. On the advice of a counselor, I cut off all communications with her…though I never explained why. Another lesson I learned: NEVER use a tv show/movie as a blueprint for life.

  • Hi🌻✌️🤟🤞🍀🖖All here is just my humble opinion.. Question : Why was Laura just SO stupid SO often in the storylines ? As a child watching this show , I was amused as her brainless antics .😄😄. now as I think about it , she really was rather stupid in her home life ..the episode where she is tricked into revealing on a game show that Alan Brady wears a toupee was perhaps the funniest episode ever .. but her character should have been savvy enough , as the wife of someone in ‘the business’ , that people will be sneakily covert in getting insider information about any ‘celeb’ even remotely connected to her life..🙄 ..Her idiocy at being tricked , live on national television before the game show audience , and not see it coming , is nothing short of utter
    naivete and stupidity🤔🧐😟..Considering how she is supposed to be so smart and worldly having a husband in show business , it really portrays Laura as quite the dunce.😱🤯😒💫💫🧠🐿️🙄🤔😟..all this stated here is just my humble opinion…. Still , in spite of the various
    unfunny writing errors during the series’ Emmy©🏆 – winning five year run .. it remained ‘must watch’ viewing in my home ..and millions of other homes .. and still does.. mostly platinum – quantity’ writing , acting , timing , , set design , music , Stellar choice of cast🏆🌟✨ , supporting cast too..all pros at their craft. 🌟.. and it was from Danny Thomas ❤️🕯️🙏🏵️🌹💐Productions , from the genius minds of Mr. Thomas , Sheldon Leonard , Bill Persky and Sam Denoff ,and the originator of the idea… The Legend known as Mr Carl Reiner .🕯️🙏🏵️🌹. it didn’t get any better than this Product this intelligently writes and acted just doesn’t exist anymore , sadly..😟.. and all without any foul. obscene language , slut – suits with all sorts of flesh hanging out , snarky , disrespectful children being mean to the elders ( although son Ritchie could have an occasional tantrum , he was extremely tame in behavior and language compared to the insufferable roles child actors portray today regarding situations , costumes and language , largely portraying adult characters as terminal buffoons , in series of recent and not so recent years
    – cartoon or live action ( ‘all in the family’ ‘married w/ children’ , ‘the simpsons’ ‘family guy’ , ‘2& 1/2 men , ‘beavis & butthead’ , ‘ that 70’s show’ , ‘the rugrats’ , ‘doug’ , Nickelodeon’s ‘the adventures of mike and mike’ ,etcetera..🙄🤢🤮😝..mostly Ritchie Petrie was generally respectful and obediant to his parents , older relatives and his father’s friends and co – workers too.something not seen enough in t.v. or films.. The Legend Danny Thomas would be spinning in his grave😞 ⚰️💨💫💫💫if he could know what kind of putrid , evil – agenda laden slop🗣️🤮🚽🚧 is being shoved in the public’s 🌐faces today🚨📈📺🖥️📲👺👀☠️ 💩🥺😝🤮🤮🤮😒😟😞😭➡️📺☠️🥺🤡💩👺💩😱😭

    ..and Karma☯️ continues to wait patiently.. ⏳..✝️🛡️📯👂🙄👍👍

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *