Skip to content

Flow

A Critical Forum on Media and Culture

A Critical Forum on Media and Culture

  • Home
  • ABOUT FLOW
  • CONTRIBUTE
    • How to Contribute
    • CURRENT CALLS
  • CREDITS
    • AUTHORS
    • EDITORIAL TEAM
    • TECHNICAL CREDITS
    • FORMER EDITORS
  • OVER*FLOW

Tag: interdisciplinary

Comics ↔ Media: Comics Aren’t Literature, and That’s Fine
Benjamin Woo / Carleton University

October 30, 2017 Benjamin Woo / Carleton University 5 comments

Benjamin Woo questions the positioning of Comics Studies within academia. Bound to both Media Studies and Literature, is either equipped to study the many facets of this interdisciplinary field?

Read more

Classroom/Space
Amelie Hastie / Amherst College

September 21, 2015 Amelie Hastie / Amherst College One comment

Amelie Hastie argues that television must be studied in a manner that fully contextualizes it within both time and material space, as must the pedagogies, course assignments, and methods of study we use to engage such pursuits.

Read more
Flow is a critical forum on media and culture published by the Department of Radio-Television-Film at the University of Texas at Austin. Flow’s mission is to provide a space where scholars and the public can discuss media histories, media studies, and the changing landscape of contemporary media.

Search Flow:

Archives

Over*Flow: Responses to Breaking TV & Media News

Classifying Dahmer: Protecting Netflix’s Homonormative Canon
Dan Vena / Queen’s University & Sarah Woodstock / University of Toronto

"I’m the Industry Baby”: The Political Economy of Lil Nas X
Wendy Peters / Nipissing University

@FlowTV Conversations…

@FlowTVFollow

FLOW
FlowTVFLOW@FlowTV·
27 Jan

New to Over*Flow: Dan Vena and Sarah Woodstock argue that Netflix’s removal of Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story from its LGBTQ TV category discards “unacceptable” queer history and protects the homonormativity of Netflix’s LGBTQ library.
https://www.flowjournal.org/2023/01/overflow-classifying-dahmer/

Reply on Twitter 1619092430342733828Retweet on Twitter 1619092430342733828Like on Twitter 16190924303427338282Twitter 1619092430342733828
FlowTVFLOW@FlowTV·
21 Jan

Check out this call for papers from our colleagues! 10 days until submissions are due.

Reply on Twitter 1616898930687500288Retweet on Twitter 1616898930687500288Like on Twitter 1616898930687500288Twitter 1616898930687500288
FlowTVFLOW@FlowTV·
13 Jan

Hey folks! We are officially extending this CFP until Sunday, January 15

Looking forward to reading your submissions!

Reply on Twitter 1613921267521884164Retweet on Twitter 16139212675218841644Like on Twitter 16139212675218841643Twitter 1613921267521884164
Load More...

Popular Posts

  • The Devil in the Details: User Tracking Is Hurting More Than Our Privacy, It’s Doing Serious Damage to Public-Interest Media, Too.
    Josh Braun / UMass Amherst
    February 22, 2019 277 comments
  • Pass the Remote: Online News

    June 10, 2005 197 comments
  • Legal Fictions

    June 10, 2005 154 comments
  • Why Do I Love Television So Very Much?

    March 9, 2007 100 comments
  • Watching Everybody Hates Chris in Brazil
    Reighan Gillam / University of Michigan
    March 5, 2013 97 comments

Tags

Advertising American Politics Comedy Commercial Interests Communication Technology COVID-19 Criticism Family Fandom Femininity Feminism Gender Globalization Global Media Global Politics Industry Masculinity Media Influence Music Netflix New Media News Over*Flow Pedagogy Pop Culture Public Media Race/Ethnicity Radio Reality TV Representation social media streaming Technology Television UK Viewing Volume 23 Volume 24 Volume 25 volume 26 Volume 27 Volume 28 Volume 29 Whiteness Youth Culture