The Summer of the Superheroes

For months, I have been wondering about the filters with which we create our reality. I have been looking at the proverbial half-glass and musing over the truth we reveal about ourselves with our descriptions of its contents. Same glass, same amount of liquid, the only difference our disposition and the interpretation we chose as a result. What was the mechanism with which we decided? How did it work? Was it something innate or something programmed into us from the outside world?

When I walked out of Superman a few weeks ago my musings took on a new dimension. I found myself intrigued, wondering about the filter Superman's seductive mythology created as it unfolded on the screen, with characters clearly defined as Heroes or Villains. How did that visual mythology affect how we viewed the world? And how did it interact with our already innate tendency to project meaning out into the world?

Most of us have been raised on a steady stream of visual media consumption. From MTV to blockbuster films, we have been trained to speak a new symbolic language. In this new language, the textures and nuances of our internal worlds are externalized and symbolized through pre-established contextual cues, such as lighting, sound, and costumes. To engage with the story, we are required to interpret the visual narrative quickly and easily. In order to facilitate this ease of interpretation, certain conventions have been created. From clothing styles to soundtrack choices, these conventions neatly delineate Heroes and Villains.

The visually coded traits of a Hero and a Villain vary from film to film in their particulars. What they share in common is a sensibility, a clear polarity that allows us to be confident who to sympathize with and root for. In mature and nuanced films, these traits are more interwoven to portray a complex character who raises questions more than gives answers. In most blockbuster films, however, the traits are heavily relied upon to set the tone of the story and to provide a clear map for the viewers to follow as they follow the hero's struggle to victory.

Superman

Superman

Superman is a classic example of these traits at work. From Clark Kent's clean cut Heroic good looks to Lex Luther's tailored suits and scheming expressions, who they are and what they symbolize are consistently and clearly represented. So clearly represented in fact that the language we are interpreting in the film–let's call it “Good Guy-ese”–begins to feel normal, natural even, which is fine as long as we are in the movie theater. But what happens when we begin to apply “Good Guy-ese” to the outside world?

Plenty of misinterpretation, that's what. The complexity and chaos of the real world does not lend itself so easily to clear delineations of hero and villain. The visual cues that “Good Guy-ese” uses are designed for snap judgments that can easily contribute to mistaken assumptions. We think we know someone's character and motives because they exhibit traits that correspond to the visual cues we have been trained to interpret.

The likelihood of misinterpretation increases exponentially when this outer visual dialect blends with an inner tendency that is at once both highly personal and deeply universal. This tendency is to interpret our own actions in a better light than we interpret others' actions. When we do something such as cutting off someone in traffic, we tend to judge our action against the arc of our total personality. We excuse it by saying we were in a bad mood, we didn't see them, we made a mistake. We don't judge ourselves as bad people; we see the action as a fleeting departure from our permanent self identity as a good person, a Hero. When someone else cuts us off in traffic, however, the tendency is to judge their character from that action. They are a bad person, an inconsiderate driver, a menace on the road, a Villain. In essence, we characterize others from their actions, while we characterize ourselves by our being (or who we believe ourselves to be).

Lex Luthor

Lex Luthor

When this inner dialect of judging others based on their actions meets the outer dialect of “Good Guy-ese,” what results is an unprecedented reality filter. It becomes all too easy to unconsciously objectify others based upon their surface characteristics and behavior. In the process, we villainize them and reduce their complex and contradictory humanity to a black and white identity position.

Instead of seeing the guy that cuts you off in traffic as a father-to-be who is frantically rushing his pregnant wife in labor to the hospital, you see a jerk. When the teller snaps at you at the bank, instead of seeing an exhausted woman who is barely making ends meet working two jobs, you see a bitch. Where there could be compassion there is a judgment, and where there could be understanding there is separation and fear.

The reality, of course, is that no one is ever good all the time or bad all the time. We are a little bit of both. Who you are depends on who you ask on any given day, including yourself. Human beings are in a constant state of flux, unlike the fixed identities “Good Guy-ese” leads us to believe in. When we are aware of the ever-shifting nature of a identity, a beautiful liberation occurs. We get to set down the heavy burden of polarity, of perfection and its attending isolation. We give ourselves permission to drop the filters and to see ourselves clearly with our flaws and our strengths. When we are no longer busy trying to force ourselves or others into our preconceived boxes of Hero and Villain, an unprecedented intimacy results. We receive the lovely opportunity to meet ourselves and our loved ones for who they really are, perhaps for the first time.

Image Credits:

1. Superman

2. Lex Luthor

Please feel free to comment.

image_print

3 comments

  • Nice Work!!

    Jen;

    I hope that all is well with you. I like the article. Excellent insights into the human psyche. Ah, the loss of empathy and compassion in today’s disconnected society. I can honestly say that I try to put myself in other’s shoes and give them the benefit of the doubt for their actions. I agree with your assessment that all too often this is not the case. I hope you did well on your exam!

    Warm Regards,

    Desiree

  • superheroes

    Nice Work indeed! It reminds us that superheroes, like ordinary human beings, equally deal with conflicted realities and truths. We do need superheroes because they respond to our deep fear of being annihilated by an imminent threat we are struggling to face up to. It is important to note that Superman was created by two Jewish artists possibly as a way to deal with the Holocaust trauma. We must also recognize that superheroes can be used to hide ordinary manifestations of fascism such as justifying abominable crimes in the name of some higher cause or truth which could explain Nazi Germany’s obsession with the myth of the Aryan which led to extermination of races and groups deemed inferiors in the name of some loony ideas about racial purity. Having said that, there is no throwing the baby with the bath water! When it comes to superheroes, I still think that Batman is the real McCoy!

  • the future of characters

    I predict that the teens today watching these live action comics will create more sophisticated nuanced characters when they become media makers…at least I hope. I think especially males often fall into the easy on the eyes ladies as well as the easy on the brain characters. The psychological depth of characters, so far, in the live action versions of hero’s are not very deep or rich. Espeically the movies, these characters are folgers compared to the actual comic characters. Serialization allows for secrets, reveals and slight character changes throughout the series. Ask any comic fanatic and they’ll tell you events that have changed the character from the time of the first to the latest edition. Shows such as Hero’s has already begun to explore the intriquite lives of extrodinary peoples. While it still has the basic plots and eye grabbing effects, enough for a dude to drool over, if it is allowed to continue on it may reveal more human vulnerable aspects to each Hero. But definately this phenomenon will come back years from now when the ten year old boy drooling over his action figures discovers he can create this himself, but with a very necessary new aspect, emotional and psychological depth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *