Skip to content

Flow

A Critical Forum on Media and Culture

A Critical Forum on Media and Culture

  • Home
  • ABOUT FLOW
  • CONTRIBUTE
    • How to Contribute
    • CURRENT CALLS
  • CREDITS
    • AUTHORS
    • EDITORIAL TEAM
    • TECHNICAL CREDITS
    • FORMER EDITORS
  • OVER*FLOW

Category: 5.13 – Special Issue: Flow Conference 2006

The Conference in Brief…

November 18, 2006 Flow staff Leave a comment

by: Flow Conference Participants
Read what folks had to say about the conference in review and on blogs.

Read more

Passion is No Ordinary Word

November 17, 2006 Tim Anderson / Denison University 2 comments

by: Tim Anderson / Denison University
Flow, the conference, worked for the same reason that the online journal does: it simply doesn’t feel careerist in any conventional way, shape or form.

Read more

Flow Fuzzies and Forget-Me-Nots

November 17, 2006 Avi Santo / Old Dominion University Leave a comment

by: Avi Santo / Old Dominion University
What will be the legacy of the Flow Conference?

Read more

Collaboration, Community, and Interdisciplinarity

November 17, 2006 Michael Kackman / University of Notre Dame Leave a comment

by: Michael Kackman / University of Texas-Austin
Like most interesting things, the Flow Conference was an experiment. And like most experiments, it generated some unexpected results.

Read more

Considering Flow

November 17, 2006 Doug Battema / Western New England College One comment

by: Doug Battema / Western New England College
The FLOW conference tackled many of TV scholars’ favorite topics, but other aspects of the medium, such as television advertising and sports programming, need to be examined with the same critical regimen we apply to narrative, fictional programming.

Read more

A Fair Use Bill of Rights

November 17, 2006 Bernard Timberg / University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill 2 comments

by: Bernard Timberg / East Carolina University
The proposed “Citizen’s Fair Use Declaration of Rights” redefines fair use as a legal issue that has become a political issue.

Read more

“Don’t Know Much About History”:
What Counts as Historical Work in Television Studies

November 17, 2006 Aniko Bodroghkozy / University of Virginia 2 comments

by: Aniko Bodroghkozy / University of Virginia
What are the parameters of scholarship in television history and why archival research matters.

Read more

Are Smart Communities Necessarily more Socially Engaged?

November 17, 2006 Ana Boa-Ventura / University of Texas-Austin One comment

by: Ana Boa-Ventura / University of Texas-Austin
The FLOW panel on Public Sphere and the InCommunity event “flow” together to the extent that they both questioned alternative “places” for social responsibility and political involvement, at a time when “government” does not seem to offer that engagement anymore.

Read more

Audience Segmentation: The Lonely Crowds

November 17, 2006 David Marc / Syracuse University 3 comments

by: David Marc / Syracuse University
The entertainment-industrial complex that dazzled the world for a century by attracting “the undifferentiated mass audience” has since worked to disassemble its prime creation into as many differentiated segments as marketers can imagine.

Read more

Taste and Fandom

November 17, 2006 Louisa Stein and Kristina Busse 4 comments

by: Louisa Stein and Kristina Busse
Two Responses to the “Watching Television Off-Television” Roundtable.

Read more

Response to the “Taste and Television” Panel

November 17, 2006 Leigh H. Edwards / Florida State University One comment

by: Leigh H. Edwards / Florida State University
Cautionary comments about the place of taste in television studies.

Read more
Flow is a critical forum on media and culture published by the Department of Radio-Television-Film at the University of Texas at Austin. Flow’s mission is to provide a space where scholars and the public can discuss media histories, media studies, and the changing landscape of contemporary media.

Search Flow:

Archives

Over*Flow: Responses to Breaking TV & Media News

Classifying Dahmer: Protecting Netflix’s Homonormative Canon
Dan Vena / Queen’s University & Sarah Woodstock / University of Toronto

"I’m the Industry Baby”: The Political Economy of Lil Nas X
Wendy Peters / Nipissing University

@FlowTV Conversations…

@FlowTVFollow

FLOW
FlowTVFLOW@FlowTV·
27 Jan

New to Over*Flow: Dan Vena and Sarah Woodstock argue that Netflix’s removal of Dahmer – Monster: The Jeffrey Dahmer Story from its LGBTQ TV category discards “unacceptable” queer history and protects the homonormativity of Netflix’s LGBTQ library.
https://www.flowjournal.org/2023/01/overflow-classifying-dahmer/

Reply on Twitter 1619092430342733828Retweet on Twitter 1619092430342733828Like on Twitter 16190924303427338282Twitter 1619092430342733828
FlowTVFLOW@FlowTV·
21 Jan

Check out this call for papers from our colleagues! 10 days until submissions are due.

Reply on Twitter 1616898930687500288Retweet on Twitter 1616898930687500288Like on Twitter 1616898930687500288Twitter 1616898930687500288
FlowTVFLOW@FlowTV·
13 Jan

Hey folks! We are officially extending this CFP until Sunday, January 15

Looking forward to reading your submissions!

Reply on Twitter 1613921267521884164Retweet on Twitter 16139212675218841644Like on Twitter 16139212675218841643Twitter 1613921267521884164
Load More...

Popular Posts

  • The Devil in the Details: User Tracking Is Hurting More Than Our Privacy, It’s Doing Serious Damage to Public-Interest Media, Too.
    Josh Braun / UMass Amherst
    February 22, 2019 277 comments
  • Pass the Remote: Online News

    June 10, 2005 197 comments
  • Legal Fictions

    June 10, 2005 154 comments
  • Why Do I Love Television So Very Much?

    March 9, 2007 101 comments
  • Watching Everybody Hates Chris in Brazil
    Reighan Gillam / University of Michigan
    March 5, 2013 97 comments

Tags

Advertising American Politics Comedy Commercial Interests Communication Technology COVID-19 Criticism Family Fandom Femininity Feminism Gender Globalization Global Media Global Politics Industry Masculinity Media Influence Music Netflix New Media News Over*Flow Pedagogy Pop Culture Public Media Race/Ethnicity Radio Reality TV Representation social media streaming Technology Television UK Viewing Volume 23 Volume 24 Volume 25 volume 26 Volume 27 Volume 28 Volume 29 Whiteness Youth Culture